now that that is out of the way, pointless as it may be i still feel it is somewhat necessary. i don't know. anyways, here is the conclusion of my research. warning: it hasn't changed much from the other time i posted about it, this one is just a bit more detailed.
at the pond the whole time. at least it was pretty for my |
Observational Methods
in Bluethenthal for 1-3 hour sessions; and a few times did marathon 8 hour sessions. observed and recorded any wildlife seen, primarily focused on mammals. dominated by squirrels & bats.
Fail Safes
had a few things in place to make sure that i didn't repeat any sightings of the same animal. i didn't record a squirrel sighting if i had seen a squirrel in the last 15 minutes. i did the same thing except for 10 minute intervals with the bats.
Graphs!
![]() |
so, this was my results for the squirrel data. as you can see, they peaked in activity during dawn & dusk. these numbers are the averages for what i saw at each hour of the day. |
![]() |
these were for the bats, and obviously they were only active when it was semi-dark outside. |
Expected
so the squirrels did about what you would expect, overall. the bats, i was just pleased to have enough data on bats to say anything about them. i was really disappointed that i didn't see anything else; no foxes, feral cats, raccoons, or anything else in terms of mammals.
Pitfalls
oh boy, were there any number of problems with just about everything:
-island geography
-small sample area, size, & timeframe
-changing fall temps
-rain
-lack of diurnal animals & no night data
-
-external humans & dogs in the forest
Improvements
getting cameras for camera trapping data would be super awesome, but i wouldn't have gotten the cameras until like last week, when my research was already basically finished. also more people than me
now i get to take all of this and put it into a poster! should be loads of fun there. :)
That sounds like an awesome project. Also, I have a feeling this is probably how Dr. Arbogast got started...
ReplyDelete